Description

Almost all city governments receive financial resources from higher-level governments (particularly the national government) either for particular purposes (“earmarked”) or as unconditional grants (“non-earmarked”). In the case of climate finance, these transfers can also come through subsidies (e.g., reimbursement for all or part of the cost of providing water supplies) or Debt for Climate Swaps.

Instrument category

National government transfers

Implementation status

High - much evidence available

Enabling conditions and success factors
  • Robust and transparent public financial management systems should be in place to ensure that transferred resources are allocated to appropriate climate action investments.
Instrument benefits
  • If national finances are available, this is a rapid and simplified method of topping up municipal resources.
Challenges and risks to implementation
  • Using national and municipal finance as the sole source for a major investment means taking on high risks and possibly losing all the resources if the project fails.
References
https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/debt-for-climate-swaps/ https://www.esmap.org/sites/esmap.org/files/DocumentLibrary/Quezon%20City%20-%20Proven%20LED%20Delivery%20Models8_Optimized_Final.pdf
cover

Want to share new instruments?

The Alliance is actively seeking updates to the financial instruments library. Please complete the form to suggest additional instruments.

Fill out the form